Cross-sectional study reveals significant HIV-related stigma during early pandemic, affecting diverse populations.
This cross-sectional study examined intersectional HIV-related stigma during early UK COVID-19 restrictions. Multiple logistic regressions and marginal effects examined demographic correlates of enacted stigma, internalised stigma, disclosure and data security concerns. Among 653 respondents, 80.6% identified as male, 69.8% as gay, and 16.9% as ethnic minority. Since the pandemic, 6.8% reported increased enacted stigma, 32.6% internalised stigma, 42.1% disclosure concerns, and 44.0% data security concerns. Younger PLWH (aged 20-39) were more likely to self-report enacted stigma than 40-59 year olds (AOR: .36, 95% CI: .16-.85) and PLWH over 60 (AOR: .24, 95% CI:.08-.73), as well as internalised stigma (AOR: .53, 95% CI: .33-.86 for 40-59 year olds; AOR: .25, 95% CI: .14-.46 for PLWH aged 60+). Compared to men living with HIV, women with HIV self-reported greater internalised stigma (AOR: 2.39, 95% CI: 1.13-5.05) and data security concerns (AOR: 2.51, 95% CI: 1.21-5.21). Compared to white PLWH, ethnic minority respondents were more likely to report data security concerns (AOR: 3.24, 95% CI: 1.84-5.70). Early COVID-19 restrictions may have exacerbated HIV-related stigma, disproportionately affecting women, ethnic minority, and younger PLWH. Future emergency responses should prioritise PLWH with intersecting vulnerabilities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pantelic et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: