Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Investigates how personalized AI affects attitudes toward genetically modified foods in China, suggesting new avenues for public persuasion.
Conversational AI has become an influential intermediary in public communication. Emerging research on conversational AI highlights its potential to correct misconceptions and influence attitudes across domains. This study investigates the persuasive effects of personalized conversational AI, focusing on genetically modified foods in China. Employing a between-subjects factorial design, 813 participants engaged in dialogues with a DeepSeek-based chatbot. Participants were randomly assigned to one of four conditions, ranging from a non-personalized generic control to increasingly tailored approaches based on demographic information, risk perceptions, or a combination of both. Results indicate that while AI interactions significantly improve attitudes and willingness to consume genetically modified foods across all conditions, the additional persuasive effect of personalization was conditional. Only a personalization strategy combining demographics and risk perception yielded greater persuasive effects than the control, primarily among participants with positive risk perceptions. Furthermore, moderation analyses revealed a divergence in individual differences: Among participants with negative risk perceptions, while greater prior experience with AI and higher trust in science decreased the persuasive effects, higher AI knowledge facilitated greater attitude gains.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: