Carbon–carbon (C–C) bond formation is necessary for hydrocarbon (and oxygenate) synthesis beyond methane (and formate/formic acid) during electrochemical CO and CO2 reduction (ECOR and ECO2R). Cu has notable ability to form hydrocarbons compared to other pure metals. In particular, the (100) facet of face-centered cubic Cu forms ethylene competitively with H2 and methane during both ECOR and ECO2R. Past simulations based on density functional theory (DFT) with standard exchange-correlation functional approximations predict fast nonelectroactive C–C bond formation channels involving adsorbed (*) CO together with another *CO, formyl (*CHO), or hydroxymethylidyne (*COH), forming OC*–*CO, OC*–CHO*, and OC*–*COH, respectively. Such simulations support the prevailing hypothesis that emergence of C2 products is kinetically determined at the early stages of the reduction chemistry. Here we show, via simulations with more accurate many-body, i.e., “correlated”, wavefunction theory (enabled by an embedding scheme), that the coupling of *CO with a *CO or a *COH (previously predicted at the same level of theory to kinetically dominate over *CHO as the one-electron reduction product of *CO) is highly activated (kinetically impeded), with free energy barriers >1 eV, in contradiction to previous DFT-based simulations. Intriguingly, we find that the coupling of two adjacent *COHs incurs only a small barrier (<0.3 eV) and is exoergic (< –1 eV); however, given the predicted low surface mobility of *COH, the emergence of HOC*–*COH is also improbable, at least at low *COH coverages. We therefore conclude that it is highly unlikely for *CO to participate in nonelectroactive C–C bond formation on pristine Cu(100), contrary to conventional wisdom, and that the energetically favorable *COH dimerization may occur only after substantial buildup of *COH on the surface.
Martirez et al. (Fri,) studied this question.