This research assesses the environmental impacts of metal-organic frameworks, highlighting sustainability strategies for industry-scale production.
Metal−organic frameworks (MOFs) are an increasingly versatile nanomaterial platform, whose functional properties make them highly attractive for diverse industrial applications. In this work, we perform a dosage-normalized cradle-to-gate life cycle assessment of three benchmark MOFs (silver-, copper-, and zinc-based) against the commercial antibiotic levofloxacin under both lab-scale and projected industrial-scale scenarios. We find that, while silver-MOF achieves the lowest functional mass per application, its environmental footprint is dominated by the precursor synthesis, whereas copper- and zinc-MOFs deliver more balanced impact profiles when normalized to performance. Process-grouping analysis pinpoints metal precursor production and solvent use as critical hotspots, informing targeted strategies—such as closed-loop metal recovery, green solvent substitution, and continuous-flow intensification—for sustainable scale-up. By embedding experimentally determined minimum bactericidal concentrations (MBCs) into TRACI 2.1 metrics, our study establishes a transferable, performance-based framework for benchmarking emerging nanomaterials against traditional antimicrobial agents and highlights clear levers to accelerate the sustainable industrial deployment of MOF technologies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Firouzjaei et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: