Data-driven approach detects nutritional deficiencies in hazelnut orchards, suggesting improved yields and plant health.
Identifying nutritional deficiencies at an early stage is crucial for maximizing yield production and ensuring healthy plants. Conventional methods generally rely on time-consuming analysis conducted by agronomic experts. To address this challenge, this study presents a data-driven approach for the early identification of nutritional deficiencies in hazelnut orchards. Different custom datasets, composed of images acquired in a real hazelnut orchard as well as in a controlled laboratory environment, are collected, and the performance of five state-of-the-art machine learning models in early detecting nutritional deficiencies is compared. In particular, ResNet, DenseNet, MobileNet, EfficientNet, and ConvNext models, along with a baseline based on support vector machines, are considered. Data augmentation techniques are introduced to synthetically increase the datasets, and their effectiveness is extensively evaluated. Additionally, a pipeline is designed to carry out the early identification of nutritional deficiencies onboard an agricultural robot. Experimental results on the early identification show that ConvNext achieves the highest performance: 81.79% accuracy and 0.8168 F1 score on a real-world dataset with four classes, and 75.54% accuracy with 0.7552 F1 score for the more challenging six-class scenario. Furthermore, the effectiveness of the integrated system is validated in preliminary laboratory experiments using a Turtlebot2 mobile base and a Franka Research 3 arm, equipped with RGB-D cameras. • Data-driven pipeline detects hazelnut nutrient deficiencies from leaf images. • Real and lab-acquired hazelnut leaf image datasets collected and publicly released. • ConvNext achieves 85.50% accuracy on 4-class hazelnut deficiencies in lab conditions. • 75.54% accuracy on 6-class real orchard dataset validates field robustness. • Two-stage pipeline with leaf detection and classification enables onboard robot monitoring.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fuoti et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: