Investigates microclimate and built environment impacts on elderly outdoor activities, suggesting implications for urban design.
Microclimate and built environment jointly influence outdoor activities among the elderly. However, existing studies largely focus on a single season or environmental factor, lacking a comprehensive analysis of seasonal variation and multi-factor coupling effects. This paper investigates the seasonal interaction effects of microclimate and built environment on elderly outdoor activities, with implications for elderly-friendly urban design. Using a typical residential neighbourhood in Xi’an as a case, we constructed a multi-source spatio-temporal dataset through high-density microclimate monitoring in winter and summer, fine-grained POI mapping, and computer-vision-based behavioural annotation. Generalised Additive Models (GAM) and SHAP analysis were employed for modelling and mechanism exploration. The results show that: (1) Elderly activity patterns exhibit a fundamental seasonal reversal—characterised as “sun-seeking and wind-avoiding” in winter and “shade-seeking and wind-pursuing” in summer; (2) Environmental factors exhibit marked nonlinear and threshold-dependent influences that vary by season; (3) Microclimate and built environment elements demonstrate synergistic interaction effects, especially pronounced in summer. Quantitatively, GAM and SHAP analyses indicate that the “effective service radius” of Elderly-Friendly POIs (defined as the threshold where positive influence approaches zero) contracted from approximately 45–50 m in winter to 35–40 m in summer, while their peak promotional effect occurred at 20–25 m. Positive POIs exhibited a significantly shorter influence range, and Negative POIs demonstrated negligible distance-dependent effects. This study confirms a “seasonal dynamic interaction” mechanism and proposes the adaptive design strategy of “sunlight and wind-shelter pockets—shade and ventilation corridors,” offering empirical and methodological support for climate-responsive elderly-friendly community planning.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: