What question did this study set out to answer?

This analysis aims to evaluate how well ICD-11 conforms to established terminology practices.

March 2, 2026Informatics and HealthOpen Access

Evaluating ICD-11 against established terminology standards: A dual-framework analysis

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

This analysis aims to evaluate how well ICD-11 conforms to established terminology practices.
Utilized two established evaluation frameworks.
Conducted independent assessments using publicly available documentation.
Identified five endpoints for evaluation results.
Engaged in author consensus discussions to resolve discrepancies.
ICD-11 Foundation met or partially met 76% of NCVHS criteria.
ICD-11 MMS met or partially met 70% of NCVHS criteria.
Areas for improvement include formal methods for maintenance and updating.
Further research is needed on cost-benefits and adoption challenges.

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Evaluation analyzes ICD-11's adherence to terminology standards, suggesting improvements for global implementation.

Giannangelo et al. (2026) studied this question.

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark