Compares individualised and arbitrary thresholds for high-intensity deceleration in soccer matches, suggesting new monitoring methods.
There is currently a lack of understanding surrounding how to quantify high-intensity deceleration actions in soccer. Therefore, this study sought to compare the use of arbitrary (ARB) and individualised (IND) high-intensity deceleration thresholds when examining the most demanding passages of play (MDP) and full matches. Fourteen male soccer players (age = 19.44 ± 1.13 yrs.; mass = 79.14 ± 7.88 kg; height = 184.16 ± 5.00 cm) were monitored during competitive matches using global positioning systems (WIMU Pro, RealTrack System SL, Almeria, Spain). IND thresholds were determined as 75% of a subject's peak deceleration ability from match data. ARB values were set as > 4m/s2 with the differences between these high-intensity deceleration thresholds analysed. ARB thresholds resulted in significantly (p < 0.01) larger distance and count metrics compared to IND during both MDP and full matches. These findings highlight the notable differences between ARB and IND high-intensity deceleration thresholds in matches. Thus, it is recommended a modified IND threshold approach is used when analysing the high-intensity deceleration demands of matches and MDP. Practitioners may be inclined to monitor high-intensity decelerations using IND thresholds, as is suggested when measuring other locomotor tasks during soccer training and matches.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Moore et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: