PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 2, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Trifluridine/Tipiracil Plus Bevacizumab Versus Regorafenib in Elderly Patients with Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Real-World Comparative Study

View Full Paper
YTYu-Kang TsengCLChang-Lin LinSCShih-Wei Chiang

Key Points

  • The study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of FTD/TPI plus bevacizumab compared to regorafenib in elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
  • Retrospective analysis of patients aged ≥ 65 treated from 2019 to 2023.
  • Comparison of treatment outcomes between regorafenib and FTD/TPI plus bevacizumab.
  • Primary endpoints included overall survival and time to treatment failure.
  • FTD/TPI plus bevacizumab showed a median overall survival of 12.5 months compared to 6.5 months for regorafenib.
  • The combination regimen was an independent predictor of favorable treatment failure outcomes (adjusted HR 0.44).
  • Permanent discontinuation due to adverse events was significantly lower in the FTD/TPI plus bevacizumab group (2.9% vs. 30.4%).

Abstract

Background: Taiwan’s transition to a super-aged society presents challenges in managing elderly patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). This study evaluated the real-world effectiveness of trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) plus bevacizumab versus regorafenib in this specific geriatric population. Methods: A retrospective study analyzed patients aged ≥ 65 treated between 2019 and 2023. Patients received regorafenib (n = 46) or FTD/TPI plus bevacizumab (n = 35). Primary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and time to treatment failure (TTF). Results: FTD/TPI plus bevacizumab was associated with significantly longer median OS compared to regorafenib (12.5 vs. 6.5 months; p = 0.039). In multivariate analysis, the combination regimen was identified as an independent predictor of favorable TTF (adjusted HR 0.44, 95% CI 0.22–0.91, p = 0.028). Regorafenib was associated with symptomatic toxicities like hand–foot skin reaction (58.7%), while the combination primarily caused asymptomatic neutropenia. Crucially, permanent discontinuation due to adverse events was significantly lower in the combination arm (2.9% vs. 30.4%, p < 0.001), facilitating a higher proportion of patients receiving subsequent systemic therapy (45.7% vs. 17.4%, p = 0.011). Conclusions: FTD/TPI plus bevacizumab is associated with improved survival outcomes and better tolerability than regorafenib. By demonstrating a manageable safety profile and minimizing treatment attrition, this regimen ensures a sustainable continuum of care, representing a favorable therapeutic option for elderly patients.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Tseng et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a52e56f1e85e5c73bf1f60https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18050788
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Fruquintinib versus trifluridine-tipiracil plus bevacizumab versus regorafenib in refractory metastatic colorectal cancer: A propensity score–matched real-world analysis.2026
  2. 2Real-world outcomes of trifluridine/tipiracil with or without bevacizumab in refractory metastatic colorectal cancer: a multicenter cohort study from Turkey.2026
  3. 3Clinical outcomes of treatments for patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer: a systematic literature review and network meta-analysis2026 · 1 citations
  4. 4Prior response to anti-VEGF agents predicts the efficacy of trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.2026
  5. 5Efficacy and safety of third-line treatments in metastatic colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis.2026