Bench study evaluates a new technique for stent implantation, highlighting improved outcomes in PCI.
Background: Precise coronary stent implantation is crucial for ostial and partial bifurcation lesions during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Conventional post-dilation coronary stent implantation often causes longitudinal stent deformation (LSD); meanwhile, even a small area of protrusion into the proximal main branch (MB) can lead to severe problems. This study aimed to introduce a novel post-dilation technique, the proximal anchoring technique (PAT), and evaluate the associated feasibility and efficacy in achieving precise stent implantation and preventing LSD. Methods: This bench study was performed in a tapered silicon vessel model, in which 3.5 × 28 mm-sized everolimus-eluting stents (Xience Xpedition™; Abbot, USA) were deployed at a nominal pressure. Post-dilation was conducted using two different strategies: the proximal anchor followed by distal post-dilation group (PAT group) and the conventional post-dilation group (dilation from distal to proximal) (D-P group). After each step, the subsequent changes in stent length were measured by optical coherence tomography (OCT). Additionally, three clinical PCI cases in which PAT and conventional post-dilation were employed are presented. Results: The longitudinal elongation of stents was significantly increased in the D-P group compared with the PAT group (p < 0.001). The OCT measurements showed that the stents were elongated during every step of the procedure in the D-P group (29.35 ± 0.10 mm vs. 29.65 ± 0.10 mm; p = 0.0054), but only slightly elongated in the first step of the post-dilation in the PAT group (28.73 ± 0.12 mm vs. 28.87 ± 0.12 mm; p = 0.2262). Conclusions: We present a novel technique, PAT, to assist in more precise coronary stent implantation by preventing LSD for partial ostial and bifurcation lesions during PCI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: