Comparison of rRNA-depleted and poly(A)-selected RNA-seq methods reveals biases in viral detection.
High-throughput RNA sequencing reveals plant viromes, but library preparation methods may bias viral detection. Here, we compared rRNA-depleted total RNA-seq and poly(A)-selected mRNA-seq using field-collected pepper leaves (Anseong and Jincheon) and garlic cloves (Hoengseong) from Korean commercial fields. rRNA-depleted total RNA-seq consistently recovered more viruses, longer contigs, and complete multipartite DNA virus genomes (e.g., milk vetch dwarf virus components, tomato spotted wilt virus segments), while mRNA-seq was dominated by highly expressed polyadenylated viruses like broad bean wilt virus 2. In Jincheon pepper, mRNA-seq missed hot pepper endornavirus, pepper cryptic virus 2, and multiple milk vetch dwarf virus segments revealed by total RNA-seq. Garlic libraries showed similar patterns, with total RNA-seq additionally detecting low-titer RNA viruses likely representing contamination. rRNA-depleted total RNA-seq provides a more complete, less biased view of plant viromes and is recommended for comprehensive virus discovery and genome reconstruction, while mRNA-seq remains useful for polyadenylated virus quantification and host gene expression analysis alongside virome profiling.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Choi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: