Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Comparative analysis estimates chlorine and fluorine ratios in magmatic fluids of Cu-Mo deposits, indicating formation differences.
Based on biotite and apatite composition of magmatic formations of Cu-Mo deposits in the southern Siberia and experimental data on systems with these minerals, an estimation of the fHCl / fHF, fHCl / fH2O and fHF / fH2O ratios is made for magmatogenic fluids. Particular deposits have been specified according to chlorine and fluorine regime, differences in which are due to differences in sources and magma formation mechanism, degree of fluid-magmatic differentiation and structural conditions of magmatic formation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sotnikov et al. (1991) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: