Pre-registered test examines time-domain change-points in geophysical data during solar eclipses, suggesting need for rigorous methodology.
This document presents a pre-registered, falsifiable empirical protocol to test whether large-scale Sun–Moon–Earth alignment during a solar eclipse is associated with statistically significant change-points (“kinks”) in selected geophysical time series, including GNSS Total Electron Content (TEC), GNSS scintillation indices (S4 and/or σϕ where available), and ground magnetometer components. Unlike the 1919 Eddington eclipse experiment, which operationalized General Relativity through spatial angular deflection of starlight, the present work defines a distinct measurement axis: time-domain perturbation detection under predefined statistical thresholds and explicit geographic and temporal controls. All observables, smoothing procedures, time windows (baseline, event, recovery), detection criteria, multiple-comparisons safeguards, control comparisons, and a binding falsification clause are fixed prior to analysis to prevent post-hoc reinterpretation. The protocol includes an addendum that locks the primary analysis pipeline, specifies empirical null construction using temporal controls, and explicitly acknowledges conventional ionospheric eclipse mechanisms as a baseline comparison. This study extends the eclipse-testing framework introduced in Eddington 2027: From Curved Space to Collapsed Waves – A Global Eclipse Campaign to Test the Total Wave Modified Schrödinger Equation (TWMSE) (Zenodo DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17068717) by removing fixed positional assumptions and shifting emphasis from spatial deflection imagery to statistically bounded time-series perturbation detection. The outcome will be reported transparently whether supportive or not.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Larry Lim Kheng Cheong (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: