Demonstrates a novel approach to synthesize copolymers that balance charge content and cytotoxicity for biomedical applications.
Synthetic polycations are key components for engineering polyelectrolyte complexes with wide-ranging biomedical potential. However, the high cytotoxicity of fully charged polycations remains a major limitation for clinical applications. To address this challenge, we report on polycations derived from the cationic monomer 2-(N,N-dimethylaminoethyl) acrylate (DMAEA), which gradually loses charge through hydrolysis, thereby reducing their charge density over time. The overall charge fraction (from 100% to 20%) was further controlled through copolymerization with the neutral comonomer 2-hydroxyethyl acrylate (HEA). The selected conditions of reversible addition–fragmentation chain transfer (RAFT) copolymerization, specifically protonation of DMAEA with trifluoroacetic acid to mask its tertiary amino groups, enabled a precise control over the characteristics of the copolymers (termed D/H) up to 75% conversions, with close agreement between theoretical and experimental molecular weights up to 100 000 g/mol, consistently low dispersities (<1.2), and an excellent match between the theoretical and actual copolymer compositions. Hydrolysis studies at pH 7.4 showed that increasing the HEA content in D/H copolymers from 20 to 50 mol % led to only a 10% increase in the hydrolysis over 3 weeks. Isothermal titration calorimetry analysis demonstrated that all copolymers retained their ability to complex with heparin, with binding strength comparable to that of commonly used polycations. Importantly, the cytotoxicity of D/H copolymers toward human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) decreased with increasing HEA content, reaching more than 80% cell viability at a relatively high concentration of 30 μg/mL. These findings demonstrate that D/H copolymers combine precise structural control with reduced cytotoxicity, making them promising candidates for biomedical polyelectrolyte platforms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sivkova et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: