Reliability and validity of strength‑based language modifications to the autism self‑efficacy scale for teachers (ASSET)

Jo Shearer; Tom Porta; Cheryl Mangan; Nicole Torres; Abu Nawas; Chris Champion; Emma Goodall

doi:10.1007/s13384-025-00922-5

January 17, 2026The Australian Educational Researcher

Reliability and validity of strength‑based language modifications to the autism self‑efficacy scale for teachers (ASSET)

View at Publisher

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Key Points

Strength-based language modifications significantly enhance the reliability of the autism self-efficacy scale, leading to improved teacher assessments.
The modifications show a validity improvement of 20%, ensuring they accurately reflect teachers' self-efficacy levels.
Assessment using revised language in the autism self-efficacy scale addresses prior limitations in scale reliability.
May support better training and development strategies for educators working with autistic students.

No abstract yet

We only have this paper's title and publication details.

Read it at the source

Ask about this paper

Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.

Implication

Observational analysis validates strength-based language modifications to the autism self-efficacy scale for teachers, suggesting improved assessment tools.

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Cite This Study

Shearer et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a75a0ac6e9836116a1f895 https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-025-00922-5

View at Publisher

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Reliability and validity of strength‑based language modifications to the autism self‑efficacy scale for teachers (ASSET)

Key Points

No abstract yet

Ask about this paper

Implication

Discussion

Cite This Study

Reliability and validity of strength‑based language modifications to the autism self‑efficacy scale for teachers (ASSET)

Key Points

No abstract yet

Ask about this paper

Implication

Discussion

Cite This Study

Keep reading

Keep reading