Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Observational analysis reveals that common predictive equations underestimate energy expenditure in colorectal cancer survivors, indicating potential inaccuracies in clinical assessments.
Most predictive equations tended to underestimate REE in CRC survivors compared with REEWRIC. The Harris-Benedict, Henry and FAO/WHO/UNUBIA equations showed both best accuracy and agreement with WRIC. They were still inaccurate, with individual variability for a relevant part of the sample. Future studies need to develop improved predictive equations for CRC survivors. This study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01570010 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01570010?locStr=Norway&country=Norway&cond).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Eklo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: