Comparison of MP-3 Microperimetry and Humphrey 10-2 for Central Visual Field Testing in Mild Glaucoma

Ryo Ohira; Euido Nishijima; Takahiko Noro; Shumpei Ogawa; Sachiyo Okude; Tadashi Nakano

doi:10.1097/ijg.0000000000002665

January 20, 2026Journal of Glaucoma

Comparison of MP-3 Microperimetry and Humphrey 10-2 for Central Visual Field Testing in Mild Glaucoma

View at Publisher

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Key Points

Central visual field sensitivity measurements were highly consistent between methods, demonstrating strong diagnostic agreement.
The MP-3 Goldmann size II program showed robust correlation with the HFA 10-2 SITA-Standard, suggesting similar effectiveness in evaluation.
Assessment utilized both MP-3 microperimetry and Humphrey 10-2 for evaluating central visual field performance in mild glaucoma patients.
Findings highlight the reliability of these testing methods, indicating potential for interchangeable use in clinical settings.

Ask about this paper

Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.

Implication

Analysis reveals strong correlation between MP-3 and HFA 10-2 in measuring visual field sensitivity in mild glaucoma, suggesting reliability of both methods.

Abstract

The MP-3 Central Goldmann size II program showed strong correlation with HFA 10-2 SITA-Standard in measuring central visual field sensitivity.

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Cite This Study

Ohira et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a75b15c6e9836116a21bbe https://doi.org/10.1097/ijg.0000000000002665

View at Publisher

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Comparison of MP-3 Microperimetry and Humphrey 10-2 for Central Visual Field Testing in Mild Glaucoma

Key Points

Ask about this paper

Implication

Abstract

Discussion

Cite This Study

Comparison of MP-3 Microperimetry and Humphrey 10-2 for Central Visual Field Testing in Mild Glaucoma

Key Points

Ask about this paper

Implication

Abstract

Discussion

Cite This Study

Keep reading

Keep reading