PurposeThis study examined whether different types of help received influence subsequent levels of functional ability in older adults.MethodsLongitudinal data were drawn from the US Health and Retirement Study (HRS), the Survey of Health, Aging and Retirement in Europe (SHARE), and the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS). A total of 4,395 adults aged 50+ were followed for 10 years on average. Mixed-effects models tested whether help status (no help, informal help only, formal help only, or both) predicted subsequent (Instrumental) Activities of Daily Living ((I)ADL) Difficulties Scores.ResultsIndividuals who had received formal help or combined formal and informal help in the previous wave showed higher subsequent (I)ADL Difficulties Scores than those who received no help.ConclusionHelp type was associated with later difficulty levels but did not alter age-related functional patterns. Further research may examine whether characteristics of the help provided can modify functional outcomes.
Hofbauer et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: