Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Exploratory study reveals that voice assistants enhance assembly self-efficacy in older adults, suggesting practical applications for independence.
Will a voice assistant (VA) compare well with a controlled-voice call (VC) in terms of assembly performance or resulting rated self-efficacy? This work is novel in extending the use of voice assistants to assembly scenarios for older adults, a context particularly relevant for those aging in place and seeking to maintain independence in everyday tasks. To address this question, we conducted an exploratory study with older adults (N = 18) to investigate the effects of a VA prototype (“Build2Race”) compared to a controlled-VC system. Participant domain-specific and general self-efficacy scores improved after carrying out the assembly task, but those scores did not differ between the conditions. Improvements in assembly self-efficacy were better sustained in the VA (versus controlled-VC) condition after one-month, but no similar advantage was observed for general self-efficacy. We hypothesize that a non-human agent may be good for task assembly self-efficacy because older adults feel like they are in charge of task performance when a VA is used. Based on the study results and interpretation we offer guidelines for developing VAs for assembly task assistance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Qu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: