This paper delves into the significant impact of the English language on local terminology, especially within the realms of diplomacy, security, and corporate settings. By examining both theoretical frameworks and real-life examples, the study illustrates that English is not just a global communication tool but also a significant force in transforming the language used in diplomatic and institutional contexts. It merges institutional and linguistic perspectives, especially through the lens of New Institutional Theory, to analyze how language helps construct organizational legitimacy and identity in diplomatic settings. Additionally, it explores lexical borrowing, translation practices, and language policies in multilingual contexts, shedding light on how English terms related to diplomacy, such as protocol, negotiation, and bilateral agreement, as well as security and corporate concepts like firewall and risk management, are adopted, modified, or resisted at the local level. The results suggest that while the English language's influence helps create a more standardized and effective framework for diplomatic and institutional dialogues, it also raises important issues about clarity, fairness, and cultural significance. Ultimately, this research reveals the intricate relationship between the global influence of English and the local linguistic identities that shape diplomatic efforts, security issues, and corporate communication.
Radović et al. (2025) studied this question.