Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cross-sectional analysis reveals improved clinical competence in nursing students with simulation exposure, suggesting enhancements in mental health training.
This study examined the impact of simulation-based education on the perceived clinical competence of undergraduate nursing students in psychiatric-mental health nursing. A cross-sectional, descriptive, and comparative design was used with 32 junior and senior nursing students at a southeastern U.S. university. Participants completed the Clinical Competence Questionnaire (CCQ), the Simulation Effectiveness Tool–Modified (SET-M), and a demographic survey. The results showed that students with mental health simulation experience had significantly higher overall clinical competence scores compared to those without such experience (p = .004). This was particularly evident in the areas of professional behaviors, general performance, and core nursing skills. Simulation effectiveness scores were high (M = 50, SD = 0.47), with debriefing sessions rated most positively. Qualitative feedback underscored the significance of simulation in familiarizing students with uncommon clinical situations and improving their readiness; however, a few participants indicated a disinterest in psychiatric nursing. The results back up the use of high-fidelity simulation in mental health education as a way to improve confidence, strengthen critical clinical competencies, and close the knowledge gap between theory and practice. Limitations of the study include a small sample size, a single-site setting, and reliance on self-reported data. Further multi-site research is recommended to investigate factors influencing simulation outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Monay et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: