Key result
Sacubitril/valsartan is linked to ~68% higher treatment effectiveness vs enalapril in older post-AMI HF patients.
Why the study?
Does sacubitril/valsartan improve cardiac structure and function compared to enalapril in post-acute myocardial infarction heart failure patients aged over 65?
Cohort (n=204)
No
Does sacubitril/valsartan improve cardiac structure and function compared to enalapril in post-acute myocardial infarction heart failure patients aged over 65?
Sacubitril/valsartan provides superior improvements in cardiac remodeling, exercise capacity, and biomarker reduction compared to enalapril in elderly patients with heart failure following acute myocardial infarction.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports sacubitril/valsartan over enalapril in elderly post-MI HF; extends RCT evidence to this real-world cohort.
OBJECTIVES: This study evaluates the impact of sacubitril/valsartan on cardiac structure and function in post- acute myocardial infarction (AMI) heart failure (HF) patients over 65 years. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 204 HF patients over 65 years who experienced AMI between January 2018 and December 2023. Patients were divided into two groups: sacubitril/valsartan treatment group (n = 103) and enalapril treatment group (n = 101). Baseline characteristics were comparable between the two groups. Echocardiographic evaluations, six-minute walk tests, treatment effects, adverse reactions, and patient satisfaction were assessed over a one-year follow-up period. RESULTS: The sacubitril/valsartan group had bigger decreases in NT-proBNP (P < 0.001) and cTnI (P = 0.030). The sacubitril/valsartan group demonstrated significant improvements in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (P = 0.002), reduced left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) (P = 0.019), and left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) (P = 0.002) when compared to the enalapril group. A substantial increase in six-minute walk test distance was observed in the sacubitril/valsartan group (P = 0.013). The treatment was significantly more effective in the sacubitril/valsartan group compared to the enalapril group (51.46% v.s. 30.69%, P = 0.011). Patient satisfaction was also higher in the sacubitril/valsartan group (P = 0.043). CONCLUSION: Sacubitril/valsartan shows superior efficacy over enalapril in improving cardiac structure, function, exercise capacity, and patient satisfaction in elderly post-AMI HF patients, as evidenced by greater improvements in cardiac function and more pronounced reduction in stress-related biomarkers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lei Yang (2026) conducted a cohort in post-acute myocardial infarction heart failure (n=204). sacubitril/valsartan vs. enalapril was evaluated on treatment effectiveness (p=0.011). Sacubitril/valsartan demonstrated greater treatment effectiveness compared to enalapril in post-AMI heart failure patients over 65 years old (51.46% vs 30.69%, P=0.011).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: