Key result
Adding metoprolol to trimetazidine is linked to ~15-point higher response in CHD with heart failure.
Why the study?
The therapeutic efficacy and influencing factors of metoprolol combined with trimetazidine in treating heart failure secondary to coronary heart disease were unclear.
Does metoprolol combined with trimetazidine improve therapeutic efficacy, endothelial function, and cardiac parameters in adults with coronary heart disease complicated by heart failure?
Cohort (n=142)
No
Does metoprolol combined with trimetazidine improve therapeutic efficacy, endothelial function, and cardiac parameters in adults with coronary heart disease complicated by heart failure?
Absolute Event Rate: 86.11% vs 71.43%
p-value: p=0.032
Adding metoprolol to trimetazidine therapy in patients with CHD complicated by heart failure significantly improved clinical response rates, endothelial function, and cardiac remodeling parameters without increasing adverse events.
Supports adjunctive metoprolol in trimetazidine-treated CHD-HF; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective randomized confirmation.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the therapeutic efficacy and influencing factors of metoprolol combined with trimetazidine in the treatment of heart failure secondary to coronary heart disease (CHD). METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on 142 patients with CHD complicated by heart failure (HF) who were treated at the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University from July 2023 to July 2025. Patients were allocated into a control group (trimetazidine monotherapy, n=70) and a joint group (metoprolol combined with trimetazidine, n=72). Clinical outcomes were compared between the two groups, including overall treatment efficacy, QT dispersion (QTd) before and after treatment, heart rate (HR), hemodynamic parameters [hematocrit (Hct), plasma fibrinogen (Fib), plasma specific viscosity], vascular endothelial function markers [calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), plasma endothelin (ET), nitric oxide (NO)], cardiac function indicators [left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left ventricular end-systolic diameter (LVESD)], and incidence of adverse reactions. Logistic multivariate regression analysis was performed to identify independent factors affecting therapeutic efficacy in CHD patients complicated by HF. RESULTS: The total effective rate was significantly higher in the joint group than the control group (86.11% vs. 71.43%, P=0.032). After treatment, QTd, HR, ET, and hemodynamic parameters were significantly decreased in both groups compared with baseline, whereas CGRP, NO, and LVEF were significantly increased. Moreover, the improvement in the joint group was significantly superior to that in the control group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the overall incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups (13.89% vs. 12.86%, P=0.857). Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified treatment regimen, diabetes mellitus, and age as independent factors affecting therapeutic efficacy (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: Trimetazidine combined with metoprolol demonstrates superior efficacy without increasing adverse reactions in CHD patients complicated by HF. This combination therapy may improve hemodynamic status, endothelial function, and cardiac function, supporting its clinical application.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liang et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Coronary heart disease complicated by heart failure (n=142). Metoprolol combined with trimetazidine vs. Trimetazidine monotherapy was evaluated on Overall response rate (p=0.032). Metoprolol combined with trimetazidine significantly improved the overall response rate compared to trimetazidine monotherapy (86.11% vs. 71.43%) in patients with coronary heart disease complicated by heart failure.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: