Why the study?
Sex-related disparities in ACS presentation, management, and prognosis are recognized, but data from the Maghreb region are limited.
Do clinical presentation, management, and outcomes of acute coronary syndrome differ between women and men?
Do clinical presentation, management, and outcomes of acute coronary syndrome differ between women and men?
Women presenting with ACS in Morocco have a higher burden of comorbidities and atypical symptoms, and undergo less revascularization compared to men, despite similar in-hospital mortality.
May warrant initiatives to mitigate sex-based ACS revascularization gaps; extends evidence of similar mortality to Moroccan women.
Objectives: Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) remains a major public health concern. Sex-related disparities in its clinical presentation, management, and prognosis have been recognized. However, data from the Maghreb region are limited. This study aims to explore sex-based differences in ACS in a Moroccan tertiary hospital. Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective, single-center study at Sheikh Zayd International University Hospital between 2021 and 2023, including 344 patients hospitalized for ACS. A comparative analysis between men and women was performed regarding demographic characteristics, cardiovascular risk factors, clinical presentation, diagnostic findings, management strategies, and in-hospital complications. Results: Among the patients, 103 were women (30%). Women were significantly older (mean age: 67.4 vs. 60.3 years, P < 0.001) and had higher rates of hypertension (74% vs. 50%, P < 0.001) and diabetes (60% vs. 42%, P = 0.003), but were less frequently smokers (3% vs. 52%, P < 0.001). They presented more often with atypical symptoms (47% vs. 20%, P < 0.001) and showed a higher incidence of heart failure signs on admission (Killip ≥2: 36% vs. 22%, P = 0.012). Non-ST elevation ACS was more frequent in women (62% vs. 44%, P = 0.003). Coronary angiography revealed a higher rate of normal or non-obstructive coronary arteries in women (24% vs. 9%, P = 0.001). Although percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was less frequent in women (65% vs. 79%, P = 0.012), there was no significant difference in in-hospital mortality (5.8% vs. 3.8%, P = 0.43). Conclusion: This study highlights significant sex-based differences in ACS. Women presented with more comorbidities, atypical symptoms, and were less likely to undergo PCI, despite similar short-term outcomes. These findings highlight the critical need for sex sensitive approaches in the diagnosis and management of ACS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zouhri et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: