Why the study?
Research on circRNAs in yaks, a unique low-intramuscular fat animal species native to the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau, is still lacking.
circVPS13C acts as a competitive endogenous RNA sponge for miR-5606-x to regulate ECHDC3, promoting intramuscular adipogenesis in yaks.
May inform yak breeding for optimized intramuscular fat; extends ceRNA mechanisms in adipogenesis but remains hypothesis-generating.
Although large-scale studies and potential pathways of genes on intramuscular fat (IMF) in livestock have been reported, research on circRNAs in yaks-a unique, low-IMF-content animal species that is native to the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau-is still lacking. Based on previous high-throughput sequencing results on longissimus dorsi with different IMF content, a novel circRNA encoded by the VPS13C gene (designated as circVPS13C) was found to exhibit significant differential expression. Here, we systematically characterized the function and mechanism of circVPS13C on IMF deposition in yaks by adopting a series of experiments. Sequencing, RNase R processing, and nucleoplasmic separation experiments confirmed the circular structure feature of circVPS13C, and it was predominantly distributed in the cytoplasm. Furthermore, these experiments demonstrated that circVPS13C was mainly distributed in the cytoplasm. The circVPS13C/miR-5606-x/ECHDC3 axis was constructed through ceRNA network analysis and validated by dual-luciferase reporter and rescue experiments. Furthermore, the function of these three potential regulators during IMF deposition was investigated through CCK-8, BODIPY, Oil Red O staining, and qRT-PCR analyses, and results showed that both circVPS13C and miR-5606-x promoted the differentiation and inhibited the proliferation of yak intramuscular preadipocytes, while the function of ECHDC3 was the opposite. In conclusion, circVPS13C could act as a competitive endogenous RNA (ceRNA) sponge to sequester miR-5606-x, thereby relieving the inhibitory effect of miR-5606-x on ECHDC3.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yin et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: