PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 3, 2026European Journal of Midwifery2 citationsOpen Access

The role of oxidative stress and antioxidant approaches in preeclampsia: A narrative review

JQJosé Juan Quilantán-CabreraLLLuis Fernando López-ÁvalosSHSelene G. Huerta-Olvera

Key Points

  • Preeclampsia is linked to oxidative stress, highlighted by increased levels of reactive oxygen species during pregnancy, leading to significant complications.
  • Evidence shows that antioxidant interventions may yield biologically relevant effects, although clinical outcomes vary between studies on preeclampsia.
  • Narrative review design summarizes the pathophysiology of oxidative stress in preeclampsia, using data from clinical studies on women with the condition.
  • The findings support the need for more targeted interventional studies to understand the true benefits of managing oxidative stress in preeclampsia.

Abstract

Preeclampsia (PE) is a potentially life-threatening pregnancy complication characterized by new-onset hypertension and proteinuria. Although multiple risk factors have been associated with its development, the underlying etiology remains incompletely understood. Among the mechanisms most strongly linked to hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, oxidative stress (OS) has emerged as a central contributor. Excessive production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) contributes to DNA damage, apoptosis, endothelial dysfunction, increased release of pro-inflammatory cytokines, and impaired anti-inflammatory responses. This narrative review summarizes current evidence regarding the role of OS in the pathophysiology of PE and explores the potential impact of antioxidant-based strategies for its prevention and management. A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, published in English, up to December 2025. Priority was given to clinical studies involving women with PE, particularly those evaluating antioxidant supplementation or related therapeutic interventions. Although it remains unclear whether OS represents a primary cause or secondary consequence of PE, accumulating evidence suggests that reduced antioxidant capacity and increased OS markers contribute to disease development and progression. Studies evaluating antioxidant-based interventions report biologically relevant effects; however, clinical outcomes remain heterogeneous. Overall, OS appears to play a key role in PE, highlighting the need for well-designed longitudinal and interventional studies to clarify causality and define the true therapeutic value of targeting redox pathways.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Quilantán-Cabrera et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a75d75c6e9836116a27873https://doi.org/10.18332/ejm/216377
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper