Its licence doesn't allow us to show a copy here.
Why the study?
The 2024 ESC guidelines integrated cardiovascular risk factors to estimate obstructive CAD pre-test probability and proposed CACS to reclassify low-PTP patients, but the impact of these recommendations needed assessment.
Does the 2024 ESC-PTP method improve the discrimination and reclassification of obstructive CAD compared to the 2019 ESC-PTP method in patients with suspected CAD?
Does the 2024 ESC-PTP method improve the discrimination and reclassification of obstructive CAD compared to the 2019 ESC-PTP method in patients with suspected CAD?
The 2024 ESC-PTP model improves discrimination of obstructive CAD over the 2019 model and could safely obviate further testing in approximately half of the population, despite a slight underestimation of CCTA-defined disease.
INTRODUCTION The 2024 ESC guidelines on chronic coronary syndromes integrated cardiovascular risk factors to estimate the pre-test probability (PTP) of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). Additionally, coronary artery calcium score (CACS) was proposed to reclassify patients with low PTP. We aimed to assess the impact of these new recommendations. METHODS Single-center cross-sectional study including 1595 patients undergoing coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) for suspected CAD. Obstructive CAD was defined as ≥50% stenosis on CCTA, with reclassification based on downstream invasive or non-invasive test results when available. Discrimination, calibration, and reclassification were evaluated. RESULTS Obstructive CAD prevalence was 14.0% (n = 223). Compared to the 2019 ESC-PTP, 2024 ESC-PTP showed improved discrimination [C-statistics of 0.76 (95%CI: 0.74-0.78) vs 0.74 (95%CI: 0.72-0.77), p = 0.042]. Regarding calibration, the 2019 ESC-PTP overestimated the likelihood of CAD (intercept -0.23, 95%CI: -0.38 to -0.09), while the 2024 ESC-PTP underestimated it (intercept 0.26, 95%CI: 0.11 to 0.41). The 2024 ESC-PTP reclassified 47.3% (n = 755) of patients, with 97.2% (n = 734) moving to a lower PTP category. Using CACS in patients with low PTP by the 2024 ESC-PTP (n = 617) would reclassify 41.3% (n = 255) to very low PTP. Of these, 1.6% (n = 4) had obstructive CAD. CONCLUSIONS The 2024 ESC-PTP model, calibrated to obstructive CAD defined by invasive coronary angiography, demonstrates slightly improved discrimination, but appears to underestimate the likelihood of CAD when evaluated against CCTA-defined disease. These guideline recommendations could obviate further testing in approximately half of the population, at the cost of 2% missed diagnoses.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sousa et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: