Why the study?
Recent years have seen a notable surge in scholarly investigations, prompting a comprehensive analysis to delineate the trajectory of HCM research over the preceding decade.
This bibliometric analysis highlights a significant increase in global HCM research from 2013 to 2023, led by the United States and key institutions like the Mayo Clinic.
Clinicians should regularly update HCM knowledge; confirms US dominance in an expanding research field.
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), recognized as the most prevalent inherited heart condition, is found in about 0.2% to 0.5% of the population globally. Recent years have witnessed a notable surge in HCM-related scholarly investigations. The aim of this study was to delineate the trajectory of HCM research over the preceding decade through a comprehensive bibliometric analysis. Utilizing the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) database, we retrieved data on HCM-related studies conducted between 2013 and 2023. The acquired bibliographic data were methodically processed and examined using VOSviewer and CiteSpace software. A remarkable escalation in HCM-related publications was observed throughout the last decade. The United States emerged as the foremost contributor, amassing a total of 2,479 publications and exhibiting the most extensive international collaborative efforts. Mayo Clinic was recognized for its significant contributions and leadership in research collaborations within the HCM domain. Dr. Iacopo Olivotto stood out as a leading figure in the field, authoring 152 articles over this period. The decade was marked by robust transnational collaborations among countries, institutions, and authors. Notably, the publications 'Circulation,' 'JACC,' and 'European Heart Journal' recorded the most citations, receiving 30,736, 26,769, and 13,192 citations, respectively. Our study presents the first in-depth bibliometric and visual exploration of the global HCM research landscape, providing an invaluable reference for clinical researchers engaged in this field.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: