Observational analysis evaluates fatigue behavior in lithium disilicate restorations, suggesting preferred materials for enhancement.
The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of the screw-retained abutment material (zirconia (Yz), lithium disilicate (Ld), Polymer-infiltrated ceramic network (Picn), and Polietheretherketone (Peek)) on the fatigue behavior and stress distribution of lithium disilicate restorative material. Ld discs (Ø= 10 mm; thickness = 1 mm) were obtained and allocated into four groups according to the abutment material factor: Yz, Ld, Picn, and Peek (Ø= 10mm; thickness 3 mm). A screw access hole was made at the center of each abutment and filled with resin composite (thickness = 2 mm). The materials were adhesively bonded and tested under monotonic mechanical load (n= 3) and cyclic fatigue (n= 15; initial load: 200 N for 10,000 cycles; step size: 100 N/10,000 cycles; frequency: 20 Hz) until failure. Finite element and Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) analyses were also performed. The obtained data were analyzed by 1-Way ANOVA for monotonic (α=0.05) and Kaplan Meier and log-rank post-hoc for fatigue data tests. All groups presented a decrease in the fatigue failure load (FFL) when compared to the monotonic test. The abutment material affected the lithium disilicate restoration performance (p=.048; F= 4.134), since zirconia showed the highest FFL (p<.05), followed by Picn and Ld, which were similar to each other (p>.05). The lowest values of FFL were found for Peek (p<.05). The screw-retained abutment material influences the fatigue behavior of lithium disilicate restorations, being zirconia the most indicated material to enhance mechanical performance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bohrer et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: