Comparative evaluation shows advanced ensemble models improve diabetes prediction accuracy, suggesting enhanced diagnostic support tools.
Accurate diabetes prediction is vital for early intervention, optimized resource allocation, and minimizing long-term complications. This study presents a comparative evaluation of traditional and advanced machine learning models for diabetes classification using a structured clinical dataset. Seven baseline algorithms were assessed against five advanced ensemble methods: CatBoost, LightGBM, XGBoost, Voting Ensemble, and Stacking Ensemble. To improve algorithm learning, the Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique (SMOTE) and feature normalization were employed. The algorithm’s effectiveness was carefully evaluated using accuracy, precision, recall, and the F1 score. Results show that advanced models substantially outperformed traditional ones, with CatBoost achieving the highest F1 score of 0.7625. Feature importance analysis identified glucose, BMI, and age as the most influential indicators, consistent with clinical evidence. These findings demonstrate the potential of ensemble learning and boosting strategies for building interpretable, scalable, and effective diagnostic support tools in healthcare settings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wisaeng et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: