⌘+K

Pulse Explore Communities Researchers Journals

Home Communities Explore

February 3, 2026Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and EconomicsOpen Access

Rethinking Money and the Eurozone through Rawlsian Contractualism

Morgane Delorme

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Key Points

Rethinking economic frameworks can enhance fairness in the eurozone, highlighting justice and equality.
The concept of rawlsian contractualism emphasizes creating a fair economic environment for all participants.
This analysis employs a philosophical lens to examine the eurozone's economic structures and injustices.
The implications urge policymakers to consider ethical frameworks for economic decision-making and societal welfare.

Implication

Philosophical exploration of economic justice in the Eurozone suggests new insights for policy reform.

Abstract

No abstract yet. The journal hasn't published one we can show.

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Cite This Study

Morgane Delorme (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a760d0c6e9836116a2debe https://doi.org/10.23941/ejpe.v18i2.992

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Keep reading

Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context:

1Deliberative Representation in Formal PhilosophyErasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics · Mon,
2On Elias Khalil’s Scope of Justice DilemmaErasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics · Wed,
3Adapt or Die?Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics · Thu,
4From Climate Science to Climate Justice, and BackErasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics · Thu,
5Immoderate Integrationism: History and Climate JusticeErasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics · Thu,

More from Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics

W.H. Hutt’s Analysis of Nazi Economics: “The Economic Strength of Dictatorships” (1939) and “Economic Lessons from the German Offensive” (1940)Tue,
Two Dimensions of Rectificatory Climate JusticeMon,
A Justified Move: Defending the Beneficiary Pays PrincipleMon,
Sufficientarianism, Thresholds, and Climate Loss and DamageMon,
Continuity, Attribution, and Loss and DamageMon,