Why the study?
Does a student-led community-based cardiovascular disease screening clinic provide accessible and effective care in an urban community setting?
Does a student-led community-based cardiovascular disease screening clinic provide accessible and effective care in an urban community setting?
A student-led community-based cardiovascular screening clinic is accessible and effective, but requires strengthened referral pathways and standardized procedures for long-term sustainability.
Supports student-led urban CVD screening with enhanced referrals; extends short-term effectiveness data but leaves long-term sustainability unresolved.
Applying the RE-AIM framework provided a comprehensive evaluation of the Y@H clinic, evidencing its accessibility, effectiveness, and educational value. While strong interpersonal delivery and measurable health impact were achieved, structural limitations in referral systems and follow-up impede sustained outcomes. Strengthening cross-sector referral pathways, standardising procedures, and embedding routine evaluation will be essential to ensure scalability, equity, and long-term sustainability of this innovative student-led community health model.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Long et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: