Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cross-sectional analysis shows AI-assisted CAD-CAM accurately predicts occlusal contacts, indicating need for clinical verification.
AI-assisted CAD-CAM workflows demonstrated progressively higher predictive accuracy as occlusal contact intensity increased, with high-intensity contacts showing the most consistent correspondence with clinical markings. In contrast, the reduced accuracy and greater variability observed for low-intensity contacts-particularly in posterior regions-underscore the continued necessity of clinical verification during device adjustment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Palma-Fernandes et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: