Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This analysis reveals how documentaries impact social perceptions of HIV/AIDS, emphasizing frames of isolation.
The question is: how can a documentary create social impact on its audience and, in turn, on society? Film critics and social scientists have considered this question since the inception of documentary filmmaking. Moreover, in the context of disseminating knowledge about infectious diseases, particularly during the HIV/AIDS epidemic, documentaries played a significant role in educating the public about the disease. Following the epidemic, documentaries were used to understand the disease and to witness the lives of people living with the virus. This article further extends the discourse of documentary studies by critically analysing two specific HIV/AIDS documentaries, 5B (2018) and Desert Migration (2015). This analysis provides insight into how the frames of the moving image capture the isolated spaces occupied by people with HIV/AIDS. For this study, Edward Branigan’s concept of frames is adopted to explore the essence of isolation. This is achieved by examining frames captured by the filmmakers through the camera lens, with a focus on the immediate surroundings of the person being interviewed. The article refers to these frames as “Frames of Isolation,” as the images reflect the spatial and emotional isolation associated with the virus.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aneetta ALEXANDER (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: