Why the study?
Patients with Limited English Proficiency (LEP) face poorer surgical outcomes, yet hospital language-access capacity varies.
Does treatment at Language Serving Hospitals reduce 7-day readmission in adult surgical patients with Limited English Proficiency compared to non-Language Serving Hospitals?
Does treatment at Language Serving Hospitals reduce 7-day readmission in adult surgical patients with Limited English Proficiency compared to non-Language Serving Hospitals?
Surgical patients with Limited English Proficiency treated at Language Serving Hospitals have significantly lower odds of 7-day readmission compared to those treated at non-Language Serving Hospitals.
May warrant routing surgical patients with limited English proficiency to language-serving hospitals; extends evidence on language support to postoperative readmission risk.
BACKGROUND: Patients with Limited English Proficiency (LEP) face poorer surgical outcomes, yet language-access capacity varies by hospital. OBJECTIVE: Compare 7-day readmission after common surgeries among adult patients with LEP at Language Serving Hospitals (LSH) and non-LSH, stratified by Spanish, Common Non-English, Non-Spanish (NENS) and Rare NENS Languages using the New Jersey State Inpatient Database. RESULTS: 34,342 adult surgical patients were discharged from LSH with 2.5% readmitted compared to 5.0% of those from non-LSH. Patients from LSH who spoke Spanish, (aOR 0.46, 95% CI 0.40-0.54), Common NENS (aOR 0.49, 95% CI 0.31-0.79), and Rare NENS Languages (aOR 0.50, 95% CI 0.40-0.63) had reduced odds of readmission compared to those from non-LSH. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical patients with LEP discharged from LSH had lower odds of readmission, suggesting LSH may be better equipped than non-LSH. Worse disparities for Common and Rare NENS Languages suggest the need to expand resources beyond Spanish.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dacier et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: