Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Observational analysis discusses mechanisms of granite formation in the Orlovka massif, suggesting genetic indicators.
Based on the study of the chemical composition of rock-forming micas and micas from melt inclusions in quartz of a full range of differentiates of Li–F granites of the Orlovka massif in Eastern Transbaikalia, possible mechanisms of the massif formation are discussed. An early stage with a trend of the mica evolution (biotite–Li-containing aluminous annite–Li-rich phengite-muscovite) in rocks, which is manifested in the synchronous Li and F accumulation in the melt, mica from the rock, and melt inclusions (an ongonite trend of the melt evolution), has culminated in the formation of porphyroblast microcline-albite granites with Li-rich phengite-muscovite and snow-ball quartz. It was this porphyroblast granite melt that has undergone the subsequent evolution (crystallization fractioning, repeated manifestation of silicate-salt liquid immiscibility, and post-magmatic metasomatism), which determined the development of the ‘apogranite process’. Melt inclusions in quartz of porphyroblastic microcline-albite granites and later amazonite-bearing rocks contain exclusively lithium-free, high-alumina muscovite. The high Li and F contents in glasses of these melt inclusions obtained after the homogenization experiments indicate the muscovite crystallization in a heterogeneous system from a depleted aluminosilicate melt coexisting with an isolated Li–F-containing hydrosalt phase. The results obtained indicate the convergence of the Li–Fe mica formation mechanism, which makes probable their crystallization both from a fluid-saturated melt (two-mica granites, porphyroblastic microcline-albite granites, amazonite granites of the southwestern flank of the massif and their pegmatitoid bodies) and as a result of metasomatic reworking of a substance (amazonite granites of the main dome) at the late-postmagmatic stage of the Orlovka massif formation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Badanina et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: