• This paper presents and solves a case of the Flow Refueling Location Problem (FRLP). • New formulation and four exact cover algorithms are presented and compared. • A New bi-objective algorithm, the Smoothest Descent Algorithm (SDA), is presented. • SDA was tested in 26 new instances derived from a real road transportation network. • Finds multiple optimal Pareto and evaluates efficiency with hyper-volumes and time. Strategic placement of alternative-fuel refuelling stations is a critical challenge for energy and transportation planners, who must navigate conflicting objectives, such as minimising capital costs and maximising service coverage. This paper presents a decision support system for the bi-objective Flow Refuelling Location Problem (FRLP) built upon the Sub-path Flow Refuelling Location Model (SPFRLM). This formulation distinguishes itself by enabling continuous facility siting along edges, managed through a dynamic separation procedure for sub-path constraints. To generate solutions efficiently, the system incorporates the Smoothest Descent Algorithm (SDA), a bi-objective method that approximates the Pareto front by dynamically switching between minimization and maximization strategies. The SDA relies on a Two-Phase Hybrid (TPH) algorithm that integrates Cut-and-Solve and Branch-and-Cut to solve the underlying sub-problems. We validate the system on a newly introduced library of 26 real-world test instances. The results demonstrate that the proposed approach captures approximately 97% of the optimal hyper-volume while requiring less than 10% of the computational time of exact methods. These findings confirm that the system is a powerful tool for stakeholders, providing rapid and accurate guidance for the strategic deployment of future energy infrastructure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vieira et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: