Key result
Personalized hemodynamic management linked to ~38% lower risk of post-induction hypotension in emergency spine surgery.
Why the study?
Post-induction hypotension is common in emergency spine surgery and may vary by time of day, prompting evaluation of a personalized hemodynamic management bundle.
Does a personalized hemodynamic management bundle reduce post-induction hypotension in adults undergoing emergency spine surgery?
Does a personalized hemodynamic management bundle reduce post-induction hypotension in adults undergoing emergency spine surgery?
Implementation of a personalized hemodynamic management bundle significantly reduces post-induction hypotension and overall hypotension burden during emergency spine surgery.
Supports personalized hemodynamic management in emergency spine surgery; hypothesis-generating with prospective trials needed before routine adoption.
Background and Objectives: Post-induction hypotension (PIH) is common in emergency spine surgery and may vary by time of day. We evaluated whether a personalized hemodynamic management (PHM) bundle was associated with reduced PIH and hypotension burden. Materials and Methods: We conducted a single-center retrospective pre–post cohort study of adults undergoing emergency decompressive or stabilizing spine surgery under general anesthesia. The PHM bundle included documentation of an individualized pre-induction MAP target (default 65 mmHg; higher for selected high-risk phenotypes), dynamic assessment of fluid responsiveness, and proactive vasopressor use (norepinephrine initiated at induction in prespecified high-risk patients), with continuous BP trajectory monitoring. PIH was defined as mean arterial pressure (MAP) < 65 mmHg or a ≥30% decrease from pre-induction MAP within 20 min. We used 1:1 propensity score matching (caliper 0.2) and provider-clustered logistic regression in the matched cohort. Results: Among 312 eligible patients (usual care n = 200; PHM n = 112), PIH varied by time of day, with the highest incidence in morning cases (46.2%; p = 0.041). After matching, 224 patients (112 per group) were analyzed. PHM was associated with lower PIH (43.8% vs. 33.0%; adjusted odds ratio 0.62; 95% CI: 0.41–0.94; p = 0.024). PHM reduced time-weighted average (TWA) MAP below target (5.7 ± 4.2 vs. 3.2 ± 3.6 mmHg; mean difference (MD) −2.3 mmHg; 95% CI −3.3 to −1.3; p = 0.001) and area under MAP < 65 mmHg (ratio 0.62; 95% CI 0.50–0.78; p < 0.001). Norepinephrine-equivalent dose was higher (Δ + 20 μg; p = 0.005) while rescue phenylephrine boluses were fewer (Δ − 1; p < 0.001); crystalloid volume was similar (p = 0.151). Conclusions: In emergency spine surgery, PIH showed time-of-day variation, and PHM implementation was associated with reduced PIH and hypotension burden.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2026) studied this question. Personalized hemodynamic management reduced post-induction hypotension from 43.8% to 33.0% (adjusted OR 0.62; p=0.024) and decreased hypotension burden in emergency spine surgery.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: