PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 4, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Human Rights Violations by the Iranian Theocratic Regime: A Systematic Literature Review

View Full Paper
LPLaszlo Pokorny

Key Points

  • The aim is to analyze the systematic human rights violations by the Iranian theocratic regime and their underlying structures.
  • Conducted a systematic literature review of peer-reviewed articles and policy documents.
  • Evaluated existing scholarly work on human rights abuses in Iran.
  • Synthesized findings to identify patterns and gaps in current research.
  • Discovered consistent institutionalized repression linked to the regime's religious and political fusion.
  • Identified key abuses including restrictions on freedom of expression and gender discrimination.
  • Highlighted the resistance to meaningful reform by entrenched power structures despite social movements.

Abstract

The Iranian theocratic regime has long been a subject of international scrutiny due to its persistent human rights violations, which are deeply intertwined with its political and legal structures. This systematic literature review examines the multifaceted nature of these violations, focusing on the regime’s theocratic foundations, its impact on civil liberties, and the broader socio-political dynamics that perpetuate systemic oppression. We synthesize existing scholarly work to identify patterns of abuse, including restrictions on freedom of expression, gender-based discrimination, and the suppression of dissent, while also exploring the role of international actors in shaping responses to these issues. The review adopts a rigorous methodology to analyze peer-reviewed articles, reports, and policy documents, critically evaluating their contributions to understanding the regime’s human rights record. Our findings reveal a consistent pattern of institutionalized repression, where the fusion of religious and political authority legitimizes violations under the guise of divine mandate. Despite sporadic social movements demanding reform, the regime’s entrenched power structures have largely resisted meaningful change, further exacerbated by geopolitical tensions and inconsistent international policy approaches. The review concludes by highlighting gaps in the literature, particularly the need for more nuanced studies on the intersection of legal reforms, grassroots activism, and global diplomacy. By consolidating diverse perspectives, this paper provides a comprehensive foundation for future research and policy interventions aimed at addressing human rights abuses in Iran.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Laszlo Pokorny (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a7cce8d48f933b5eed8d48https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18837712
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Gender and Human Rights Challenges: An Analysis of the Iranian Government's Political Influence on Family Law2024 · 2 citations
  2. 2Systemic Discrimination and Violence Against Iranian Sunni Muslims: A Systematic Literature Review on the Role of Iran's Shia Muslim Leadership2026
  3. 3When law becomes violence: Structural and symbolic harm in Iran’s religious state2026
  4. 4The Politics of Human Rights in Iran: Between Islamism and Pragmatism2025
  5. 5Human rights in international law, state responsibilities and accountability mechanisms: a case study of Iran2024 · 2 citations