PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 4, 2026Energies2 citationsOpen Access

AdBlue Port Injection for Dual-Fuel Compression-Ignition Engine Knock Suppression

View Full Paper
TSThor SciclunaMFMario Farrugia

Key Points

  • This research aims to evaluate AdBlue port injection as a strategy for suppressing knock in dual-fuel diesel–LPG engines.
  • Conducted experiments on a 2.0 L diesel–LPG engine at specified RPM and load conditions.
  • Quantified knock intensity using knock-induced signal energy derived from in-cylinder pressure changes.
  • Analyzed combustion characteristics through heat release rate (HRR) and mean fuel burnt (MFB) analyses.
  • Baseline operation showed severe knock with a peak heat release rate of approximately 200 J/°CA and a mean knock-induced signal energy of 307.2 bar².
  • Water port injection reduced peak HRR by 56% and mean KISE by 88%, but reduced peak pressure and brake mean effective pressure.
  • AdBlue port injection reduced peak HRR by 37% and KISE by 82.6%, while maintaining pressure metrics consistent with baseline.

Abstract

Dual-fuel, diesel–LPG (LPG being Liquified Petroleum Gas, e.g., propane) compression-ignition engines reduce CO2 and particulate emissions compared to diesel-only operation but are prone to knock at high load due to charge homogeneity and increased ignition delay. AdBlue port injection (API) was evaluated as a combustion stabilisation strategy for a diesel–LPG engine and compared with water port injection (WPI). Experiments were performed on a 2.0 L diesel–LPG engine operated at 2000 RPM, BMEP ≈ 9 bar, λ ≈ 1.27 and LPG substitution of 72%. Knock intensity was quantified using knock-induced signal energy (KISE) derived from the oscillatory component of the in-cylinder pressure over a knock-sensitive crank angle window. Characterisation of combustion was done through HRR analyses, MFB analyses and FFT-based frequency characterisation. Baseline operation exhibited severe knock with a peak HRR ≈ 200 J/°CA and mean KISE of 307.2 bar2. WPI at a water mass ratio WMR of 130% reduced the peak HRR by 56% and mean KISE by 88%, but decreased the peak pressure, BMEP and BTE. API at an AdBlue mass ratio AMR of 130% reduced the peak HRR by 37% and KISE by 82.6% while maintaining BMEP and BTE within baseline variability. Both strategies attenuated the dominant ~19.8 kHz (1,2) mode. NOx emissions decreased with WPI but increased at a high AMR.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Scicluna et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a7cce8d48f933b5eed8d56https://doi.org/10.3390/en19051242
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper