Simulation analyzes revenue and emissions outcomes of virtual power plants in China's electricity market, highlighting policy needs.
China's new power system faces dual challenges: inefficient aggregation of distributed energy and underdeveloped inter-provincial trading mechanisms. Virtual power plant (VPP), leveraging its resource integration and flexible scheduling capabilities, could mitigate these issues. This study employs a system dynamics model to simulate VPP participation in coordinated electricity-carbon-green certificate markets, designing five trading scenarios for two provincial VPPs (VPP1: high-demand; VPP2: renewable-rich). Results show: (1) inter-provincial price disparities—carbon emissions and green certificate trading prices vary by 7%–30% and 3%–49%, respectively, enabling VPPs to exploit arbitrage opportunities; (2) heterogeneous revenue structures—inter-provincial carbon-green certificate trading enhances VPP1's carbon emissions trading market revenue more than its tradable green certificate market revenue, whereas VPP2 exhibits the opposite trend; (3) revenue optimization—inter-provincial electricity trading increases total income for VPP1 and VPP2 by 14.1% and 28.1%, respectively, with electricity sales remaining the primary revenue stream; and (4) divergent sustainability impacts—VPP1 reduces carbon emissions by 53% (138.7t), whereas VPP2 faces a 42% (3.5t) increase due to coal-based backup generation. In addition, VPP2 avoided the expiration of 149 500 green certificates. This study highlights the necessity of province-specific trading policies, maximizing the advantages of the VPP to align economic incentives with emission reduction goals.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: