PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 4, 2026Harm Reduction Journal0 citationsOpen Access

ZIP code-level alcohol outlet density and nonfatal overdose among people who inject drugs in 22 US metropolitan statistical areas: a multilevel modeling analysis

View Full Paper
SPSnigdha PeddireddySBStephanie BeaneCYCourtney R. Yarbrough

Key Points

  • This research aims to investigate the association between alcohol outlet density and the risk of nonfatal overdose among people who inject drugs, considering race/ethnicity differences.
  • Linked individual-level National HIV Behavioral Surveillance data with ZIP code-level alcohol outlet density data.
  • Analyzed data from 9,764 people who inject drugs across 22 metropolitan areas using multilevel modeling techniques.
  • Assessed the relationship between alcohol outlet density and nonfatal overdose using hierarchical generalized linear models.
  • 28% of the sample experienced a nonfatal overdose in the previous year.
  • The median alcohol outlet density was 4.0 outlets per square mile.
  • The study found no significant relationship between alcohol outlet density and odds of overdose (OR: 1.01, 95% CI 1.00–1.02).

Abstract

Alcohol outlet density (AOD) is associated with drinking behaviors and related harms across several populations. As alcohol consumption compounds the depressive effects of opioids to increase overdose risk among people who inject drugs (PWID), this study investigated (1) whether off-premise AOD is associated with the risk of nonfatal overdose among a large sample of PWID, and (2) whether this relationship varies by individual race/ethnicity. We linked individual-level 2018 National HIV Behavioral Surveillance (NHBS) data with ZIP code-level data on off-premise AOD in 2016 from the US Census Bureau’s ZIP Code Business Pattern survey. NHBS surveys PWID across 22 metropolitan statistical areas (i.e., urban cores and surrounding counties with ≥ 50,000 residents, defined by commuting patterns) using respondent-driven sampling. Hierarchical generalized linear models quantified the association between AOD and nonfatal overdose, overall and by PWID race/ethnicity. The sample comprised 9,764 PWID who used opioids, 45% of whom were non-Hispanic/Latine White, 38% non-Hispanic/Latine Black, and 18% Hispanic/Latine. Over a quarter (28%) experienced an overdose in the past year. The median outlet density was 4.0 outlets per square mile. The adjusted model did not show a significant relationship between AOD and odds of overdose (OR: 1.01, 95% CI 1.00–1.02), and the relationship remained null in the race/ethnicity interaction model. Regulating AOD alone may not effectively mitigate overdose risk among PWID. Future research should explore why overdoses among PWID are not sensitive to changes in AOD. Possible explanations to consider are whether (1) AOD is unassociated with alcohol consumption among PWID, or (2) PWID stagger the timing of their alcohol consumption so it does not coincide with opioid consumption.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Peddireddy et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a7cd0bd48f933b5eed9113https://doi.org/10.1186/s12954-026-01414-0
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper