PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 4, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Differential Hydrostatic Detector for Measuring the Temporal Difference Between Gravitational and Light Signals During a Solar Eclipse

View Full Paper
YTYurii Yu. TrokhimchukInstitute of Mathematics

Key Points

  • To measure the temporal difference between gravitational and light signals during a solar eclipse using a direct operational test.
  • Proposed a new experimental setup to measure temporal differences using a mechanical load cell.
  • Employed two independent measurement channels: hydrostatic (water) and barometric (atmosphere).
  • Measured anomalies in mechanical loads to determine timing of gravitational signals against calculated astronomical events.
  • Identified the temporal difference between gravitational potential measurements and light signals.
  • Found consistent breaks in both hydrostatic and barometric channels, confirming the same effect from independent measurements.

Abstract

The propagation speed of the static gravitational potential has never been measured by a direct operational method. Existing evidence consists either of indirect observations — orbital stability, light deflection — or results of complex mathematical processing within the same model being tested. LIGO results concern exclusively the dynamic regime of gravitational waves under catastrophic mass accelerations and were obtained via an electromagnetic reference standard without independent verification by a fundamentally different method — and therefore cannot be considered an answer to the question of the static potential. We propose the first direct operational test by measuring the temporal difference X = Tbreak Tgeom between an anomalous jump on a mechanical load cell and the astronomically calculated moment of geometric contact C1. The experiment employs two independent physical channels — hydrostatic and barometric — which detect the same effect through different media: water and atmosphere. Coincidence of breaks in both channels constitutes mutual confirmation from two physically independent measurements. All scenarios are considered equally possible. The author has no prior hypothesis regarding the expected outcome.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Yurii Yu. Trokhimchuk (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a7cd5ed48f933b5eed9aabhttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18827708
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper