PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 4, 2026Romanian Journal of Cardiology0 citationsOpen Access

Right atrial and ventricular strain in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: Correlation with N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide

MNMohamed Fahmy El NoamanyADAshraf Abdelraof DawoodSESara Mohamed Elzeiny

Key Result

Right ventricular global longitudinal strain was significantly reduced in HFpEF patients (16.79±3.96%) compared to controls (25.35±1.89%), and NT-proBNP was elevated (610±15.6 pg/mL vs. 103±7 pg/mL; cutoff 383 pg/mL, sensitivity 96%, specificity 94%).

Key Points

  • To explore the connection between right heart strain and NT-proBNP levels in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.
  • Conducted a single-center, prospective case-control study.
  • Included 39 patients with HFpEF and 20 healthy controls.
  • Assessed right atrial and right ventricular function via 2D echocardiography and speckle-tracking strain analysis.
  • Measured serum NT-proBNP levels using ELISA.
  • HFpEF patients exhibited significantly lower RV global longitudinal strain (16.79% vs. 25.35% in controls).
  • RA strain was also significantly lower in HFpEF patients (20.94% vs. 39.95% in controls).
  • NT-proBNP levels were markedly higher in HFpEF patients (610 pg/mL vs. 103 pg/mL in controls).
  • Inversely correlated NT-proBNP levels with RV GLS (r = -0.737) and RA strain (r = -0.739), both p < 0.001.

Study Design

Type

Case-Control (n=59)

Multicenter

No

Structured PICO

Does right ventricular and right atrial strain assessed by speckle-tracking echocardiography correlate with serum NT-proBNP levels in patients with HFpEF?

P
Population
59 adults (> 18 years), including 39 consecutive patients diagnosed with HFpEF (LVEF ≥ 50%, H2FPEF score ≥ 6) and 20 age- and sex-matched healthy controls.
I
Intervention
Assessment of right ventricular and right atrial strain by 2D speckle-tracking echocardiography (STE) and measurement of serum NT-proBNP levels
C
Comparator
20 age- and sex-matched healthy controls
O
Outcome
Relationship between right ventricular and right atrial (RA) strain assessed by speckle-tracking echocardiography (STE) and serum NT-proBNP levelssurrogate

Right ventricular and right atrial dysfunction assessed by speckle-tracking echocardiography is prevalent in HFpEF and correlates strongly with elevated NT-proBNP levels.

Main Result

Effect estimate: p<0.001

Absolute Event Rate: 16.79% vs 25.35%

p-value: p=<0.001

Limitations

  • Single-center study with relatively small sample size limiting statistical power and generalizability
  • No multivariable adjustment to account for confounders such as diabetes, hypertension, renal dysfunction
  • Subgroup analyses and longitudinal data lacking
  • Right atrial volume index and RV ejection fraction not measured in all participants
  • Potential variability due to treatment differences among HFpEF patients
  • Influence of atrial fibrillation on strain and NT-proBNP levels could not be fully addressed
  • Relatively small sample size limits statistical power, subgroup analyses, and generalizability
  • Did not account for potential confounders such as diabetes and hypertension
  • Treatment variations among HFpEF patients may have introduced variability
  • Influence of atrial fibrillation on RA strain and NT-proBNP could not be fully addressed
  • Right atrial volume index (RAVI), RV ejection fraction (RVEF), and 3D speckle-tracking echocardiography were not routinely available

Abstract

Abstract Background Right ventricular (RV) dysfunction is frequently observed in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) is a neurohormone released in response to ventricular strain with elevated serum levels supporting the diagnosis of HFpEF and RV dysfunction. Objectives To evaluate the relationship between right ventricular and right atrial (RA) strain assessed by speckle-tracking echocardiography (STE) and serum NT-proBNP levels in patients with HFpEF. Methods This single-center, prospective case-control study included 39 HFpEF patients and 20 age-and sex-matched healthy controls. RA and RV function were assessed by 2D transthoracic echocardiography and speckle-tracking strain (STE), with RV GLS calculated from a six-segment model. Strain values are reported as absolute numbers, and serum NT-proBNP was measured by ELISA. Results The HFpEF group showed significantly impaired RV global longitudinal strain (16.79 ± 3.96% vs. 25.35 ± 1.89% for the controls) and RA strain (20.94 ± 8.78% vs. 39.95 ± 2.03% for the controls), with p < 0.001 for both. Serum NT-proBNP levels were markedly higher in HFpEF patients (610 ± 15.6 pg/mL vs. 103 ± 7 pg/mL for controls, p < 0.001), with a diagnostic cutoff of 383 pg/mL achieving 96% sensitivity and 94% specificity. NT-proBNP was strongly inversely correlated with RV GLS (r = -0.737) and RA strain (r = -0.739), with p < 0.001 for both. Conclusions Right ventricular and right atrial dysfunction assessed by STE is prevalent in HFpEF and correlates strongly with NT-proBNP levels. These findings support the combined use of right heart strain parameters and NT-proBNP for improved assessment and risk stratification in HFpEF.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Noamany et al. (2026) conducted a case-control in Adults with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (LVEF≥50%, H2FPEF score≥6) and age- and sex-matched healthy controls (n=59). 2D speckle-tracking echocardiography assessment and NT-proBNP measurement vs. Age- and sex-matched healthy controls was evaluated on Right ventricular global longitudinal strain (RV GLS), right atrial strain, and serum NT-proBNP levels (p<0.001, p=<0.001). Right ventricular global longitudinal strain was significantly reduced in HFpEF patients (16.79±3.96%) compared to controls (25.35±1.89%), and NT-proBNP was elevated (610±15.6 pg/mL vs. 103±7 pg/mL; cutoff 383 pg/mL, sensitivity 96%, specificity 94%).

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a7cd5ed48f933b5eed9acdhttps://doi.org/10.2478/rjc-2026-0002
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper