PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 4, 2026Journal of Clinical Oncology0 citations

Evaluating frailty and quality of life in low-income, uninsured men with prostate cancer.

View Full Paper
EVEshwin VargheseJCJiayue ChenLKLorna Kwan

Key Points

  • The aim is to assess frailty across multiple domains and its association with quality of life in low-income, uninsured men with prostate cancer.
  • Retrospective assessment of frailty using a deficit accumulation frailty index.
  • Health-related quality of life measured with the UCLA Prostate Cancer Index.
  • Analysis of associations between frailty and quality of life outcomes using multivariable logistic regression.
  • 25% of participants were classified as frail, 45% as pre-frail, and 30% as non-frail.
  • Quality of life was significantly worse in pre-frail and frail groups across all health-related quality of life domains.
  • Sexual function showed the greatest impairment among frail individuals (mean score of 24.6), indicating severe challenges.

Abstract

334 Background: We evaluated frailty across multiple domains and examined its association with prostate cancer (PCa)-specific health-related quality of life (HRQoL) outcomes in low-income, uninsured men enrolled in the Improving Access, Counseling and Treatment for Californians with Prostate Cancer (IMPACT) Program. Methods: We retrospectively assessed frailty using a deficit accumulation frailty index, derived from the RAND SF-12v2 (12-Item Short Form Survey, version 2), California Health Interview Survey (CHIS), and Total Illness Burden Index for Prostate Cancer (TIBI-CaP). PCa-specific HRQoL was measured at IMPACT enrollment, using the UCLA Prostate Cancer Index (PCI), which covers urinary, sexual, and bowel function and bother. We analyzed associations between frailty status and PCI domains using multivariable logistic regression. Results: Among 358 participants (mean age 60; 68% Hispanic), 25% were frail, 45% were pre-frail, and 30% were non-frail. Across all PCI domains, PCa-specific HRQoL was significantly worse in the pre-frail and frail groups. Sexual function demonstrated the greatest impairment (mean ± SD: non-frail 54.1 ± 33.9 vs pre-frail 38.2 ± 31.3 vs frail group 24.6 ± 28.9, p<0.0001). After covariate adjustment, frailty remained independently associated with worse PCa-specific HRQoL across all PCI domains, while pre-frailty showed clinically significant worse urinary bother (estimate (SE): -12.5 (5.1), p=0.0151), sexual function (-14.8 (4.4), p=0.0009), and sexual bother (-22.2 (5.8), p<0.0001) compared with non-frailty. Conclusions: Frailty is significantly associated with poorer PCa-specific HRQoL in low-income, uninsured men. These findings suggest that comprehensive frailty assessment has a role in stratifying risk of HRQoL reduction and guiding personalized interventions to improve genitourinary dysfunction and bother in men with PCa. Frailty group comparison of adjusted PCI estimates (N=358). (non-frail group estimate used as reference) PCI Domain Estimate (SE) Urinary Function Urinary Bother Sexual Function Sexual Bother Bowel Function Bowel Bother Frail -15.8 (4.2) -29.1 (6.1) -29.0 (5.3) -27.2 (6.8) -15.8 (3.0) -23.4 (4.8) p-value a p=0.0002 p<0.0001 p<0.0001 p<0.0001 p<0.0001 p<0.0001 Pre-frail -7.4 (3.6) -12.5 (5.1) -14.8 (4.4) -22.2 (5.8) -4.1 (2.5) -8.5 (4.1) p-value a p=0.0391 p=0.0151 p=0.0009 p=0.0001 p=0.1011 p=0.0385 a p-value < .0083 is significant after Bonferroni correction.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Varghese et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a7cd7ed48f933b5eed9e9ehttps://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2026.44.7_suppl.334
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Impact of frailty on hospitalized patients with prostate cancer: A retrospective analysis.2024 · 1 citations
  2. 2Poor quality of life in patients with and without frailty: co-prevalence and prognostic implications in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions and cardiac catheterization2020 · 20 citations
  3. 3Effect of frailty measures on overall survival in prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.2026
  4. 4Association between Geriatric 8 frailty and health-related quality of life in older patients with cancer (PROGNOSIS-G8): a Danish single-centre, prospective cohort study2024 · 14 citations
  5. 5Impact of frailty on cancer-related fatigue and quality of life in outpatients with prostate cancer: a cross-sectional study of patient-reported outcomes2024 · 6 citations