Cross-sectional study assesses medication adherence and barriers in chronic uveitis, indicating the need for personalized strategies.
This study aimed to evaluate medication adherence among patients with chronic uveitis using the five-item Medication Adherence Report Scale (MARS-5) and to identify the difficulties and barriers affecting adherence. A single-center, cross-sectional study was conducted with 99 adult patients diagnosed with chronic uveitis. Participants completed sociodemographic and disease-related questionnaires, the MARS-5 scale, and if scoring below 25 a nine-item adherence barrier questionnaire. Descriptive statistics and appropriate parametric or non-parametric tests were used to analyze relationships between adherence and sociodemographic or clinical variables. The mean age of the participants was 32.6 ± 8.7 years, and the mean total MARS-5 score was 22.9 ± 2.3. Adherence levels were perfect in 38.4% of patients, high in 48.5%, and moderate in 13.1%; no participants demonstrated poor adherence. Male patients exhibited significantly lower MARS-5 scores than females (p < 0.001). A moderate positive correlation was found between adherence and duration of medication use (r = 0.447, p = 0.012). The item most frequently indicating non-adherence was “forgetting to take medication.” The most commonly reported barriers were fear of side effects (34.4%) and medication-related difficulties such as unpleasant taste, tablet size, or injection-related concerns (26.2%). Medication adherence among chronic uveitis patients was generally high but influenced by sociodemographic and behavioral factors. Both intentional and unintentional non-adherence were observed, emphasizing the need for individualized adherence-support strategies, improved patient education, and enhanced communication to optimize long-term disease management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Çağlayan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: