This article examines reforestation efforts in postwar South Korea, revealing implications of environmental policies in a Cold War context.
This article reexamines the early history of reforestation in postwar South Korea, focusing on the 1950s, a decade typically overshadowed by the authoritarian tree-planting campaigns of the Park Chung Hee era. American aid agencies and South Korean foresters jointly promoted a model of preservation forestry that prioritized a few fast-growing species such as pitch pine, black locust, and Manchurian alder over ecological diversity. This shift was part of a broader U.S. strategy of “green imperialism,” which aimed to stabilize Northeast Asian agriculture while turning Southeast Asian forests into timber reserves. At the local level, South Korea’s Village Forestry Associations (VFAs), originally a colonial institution, became key actors in mobilizing peasant labor through a mix of incentives and education. While U.S. advisors celebrated the VFAs as examples of grassroots democracy, the resulting reforestation was less a democratic achievement than an artificial ecosystem sustained by international funding, peasant labor, and postcolonial compromises.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jaeyoung Ha (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: