PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 5, 2026International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems2 citationsOpen Access

Physics-informed data-driven modeling of AC optimal power flow via quadratic approximation

View Full Paper
HTHang TianUniversity of JinanXWXiandong WangUniversity of JinanXQXiaoyi QianJiangsu University

Key Points

  • The research aims to develop a physics-informed, data-driven framework for enhancing AC optimal power flow modeling using quadratic approximations.
  • Developed two models: Convex Quadratic Approximation Model and Non-convex Quadratic Approximation Model.
  • Utilized field measurements and sparsity-promoting semidefinite programming for convex optimization.
  • Employed regularized quadratic programming to refine solutions and ensure feasibility.
  • Demonstrated significant improvements in optimal values and constraint satisfaction compared to baseline surrogates.
  • CQAM provided fast and tractable optimization solutions.
  • NQAM achieved near-exact feasibility with high fidelity in results.

Abstract

Parameters in alternating-current optimal power flow (AC-OPF) models evolve with operating conditions and equipment aging, which can create a gap between analytical models and field behavior. To mitigate this effect, this paper leverages field measurements within a physics-informed, data-driven framework that preserves the OPF structure while learning high-fidelity quadratic surrogates of network physics. Two complementary models are proposed. The Convex Quadratic Approximation Model (CQAM) replaces non-convex constraints with data-driven convex under-estimators and concave over-estimators constructed via sparsity-promoting semidefinite programming (SDP), yielding a tractable convex program that admits globally optimal solutions for the convexified problem. The Non-convex Quadratic Approximation Model (NQAM) learns explicit quadratic equalities through regularized quadratic programming (QP), closely matching the AC-feasible set and producing solutions that satisfy power flow constraints within numerical tolerances. A cooperative workflow exploits their strengths: CQAM provides fast screening and dispatch when tractability is critical, whereas NQAM refines solutions and supports feasibility recovery. Experiments on standard OPF benchmarks demonstrate improvements in optimal value and constraint satisfaction compared to representative baseline surrogates, while maintaining competitive runtimes. • Data-driven, physics-guided optimal power flow using learned quadratic surrogates. • Convex quadratic model enables fast, tractable optimization with guarantees. • Non-convex quadratic model restores near-exact feasibility with high fidelity. • Cooperative workflow balances speed and fidelity for practical applications.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Tian et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a91d55d6127c7a504c0040https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2026.111714
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Initial estimate of AC optimal power flow with graph neural networks2024 · 26 citations
  2. 2Unsupervised Learning for Solving AC Optimal Power Flows: Design, Analysis, and Experiment2024 · 34 citations
  3. 3Probabilistic power flow with topology changes based on deep neural network2019 · 87 citations
  4. 4Data-Driven Power Flow Linearization: A Regression Approach2018 · 228 citations
  5. 5Fast Calculation of Probabilistic Power Flow: A Model-Based Deep Learning Approach2019 · 141 citations