PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 5, 2026Public humanities.0 citationsOpen Access

Creative Writing and AI: A 2024 Case Study

SPSowon S. ParkUniversity of California, Santa Barbara

Key Points

  • The aim is to explore the implications of AI involvement in writing and its effects on traditional authorship.
  • Analyzed submissions from a literary competition including human and AI-generated works.
  • Evaluated judges' biases and frameworks in interpreting these works.
  • Contrasted judges' expectations with actual outcomes observed in submissions.
  • AI-generated literature demonstrates creative potential rather than simply being mechanical.
  • Judges struggled to distinguish between human and AI submissions.
  • AI challenges traditional concepts of authorship and expands creative boundaries.

Abstract

Abstract This paper analyzes the 2024 Mellichamp Mind and Machine Initiative at UCSB, a pioneering AI-inclusive literary competition accepting human, AI, and hybrid works. As Head Judge, I explore key questions confronting the panel: Will AI render human writing obsolete? Can machine-generated literature exhibit creativity or remain mechanical? Are AI and human writing distinguishable? What does authorship mean in an era of AI collaboration? The paper examines judges’ interpretive frameworks, biases, and expectations, contrasting them with outcomes observed in submissions. It also considers how AI challenges traditional notions of the author and fosters new creative possibilities.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sowon S. Park (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a91d9bd6127c7a504c0885https://doi.org/10.1017/pub.2025.10098
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper