Experimental study examines how leading-edge vortex generators affect cavitation and structural response in hydrofoils, suggesting design improvements.
Unsteady cavitation on hydrofoils generates strong pressure fluctuations that couple with structural deformation, yet the influence of passive control on three-dimensional hydroelastic dynamics remains insufficiently resolved. This study experimentally examines how a wedge-type leading-edge vortex generator (VG) alters cavitation morphology and structural response on the National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics (NACA) 0015 hydrofoils. Three models, including a rigid stainless-steel hydrofoil, a flexible polyvinyl chloride hydrofoil, and a flexible hydrofoil equipped with a wedge VG, were tested across various cavitation conditions at two Reynolds numbers. High-speed imaging system captured the evolution of partial and cloud cavitation, while stereo digital image correlation provided full-field time-resolved deformation and modal content. The results reveal that the original flexible hydrofoil exhibited re-entrant jet-driven cloud shedding and a narrow lock-in region, where the shedding frequency synchronized with the first bending mode. In contrast, the hydrofoil with a VG generated streamwise vortices that disrupted large-scale cloud formation, shifted shedding to higher and less energetic frequencies, substantially reduced cavity volume, and eliminated resonance. These findings clarify how leading-edge passive control modifies cavitation–structure coupling and provide insights for designing hydroelastic cavitation mitigation strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lin et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: